Re: [PATCH Commitred] Fix PR target/48767

2011-04-27 Thread Kaz Kojima
"Joseph S. Myers" wrote: > Yes, that testcase looks like what I had in mind, but you don't need the > dg-* directives (the defaults in gcc.c-torture/compile should be fine). > >> BTW, is it valid C? > > I think this should be considered the same as passing a type such as > "short" that can nev

Re: [PATCH Commitred] Fix PR target/48767

2011-04-27 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, Kaz Kojima wrote: > "Joseph S. Myers" wrote: > > I think you should add a testcase to gcc.c-torture/compile, unless there > > is already one that this patch fixes. > > Ah, indeed. How about the attached testcase? Yes, that testcase looks like what I had in mind, but you d

Re: [PATCH Commitred] Fix PR target/48767

2011-04-26 Thread Kaz Kojima
"Joseph S. Myers" wrote: > I think you should add a testcase to gcc.c-torture/compile, unless there > is already one that this patch fixes. Ah, indeed. How about the attached testcase? BTW, is it valid C? Regards, kaz -- --- ORIG/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr48767.c1

Re: [PATCH Commitred] Fix PR target/48767

2011-04-26 Thread Joseph S. Myers
I think you should add a testcase to gcc.c-torture/compile, unless there is already one that this patch fixes. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com