Re: closing PR's (was Re: [PATCH ARM iWMMXt 0/5] Improve iWMMXt support)

2013-02-22 Thread nick clifton
Hi Hans-Peter, Sorry if I misinterpret, but it seems a reminder is in order: magic powers are attached to whome...@gcc.gnu.org accounts in bugzilla, so when people use them instead of their whome...@employer.example.com, they are able to close PR's they haven't created. Ah - thank you, I did no

closing PR's (was Re: [PATCH ARM iWMMXt 0/5] Improve iWMMXt support)

2013-02-20 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, nick clifton wrote: > > Also, could you close its duplicates, bugs 36798 and 36966? > > Sorry no. I do not actually own these PRs, so I cannot close them. :-( Sorry if I misinterpret, but it seems a reminder is in order: magic powers are attached to whome...@gcc.gnu.org accou

Re: [PATCH ARM iWMMXt 0/5] Improve iWMMXt support

2013-01-28 Thread nick clifton
Hi Matt, Could this patch, or perhaps the much smaller one I attached to bug 35294 be committed to the 4.7 branch? Yes. Done. Also, could you close its duplicates, bugs 36798 and 36966? Sorry no. I do not actually own these PRs, so I cannot close them. :-( Cheers Nick

Re: [PATCH ARM iWMMXt 0/5] Improve iWMMXt support

2013-01-27 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 7:56 AM, nick clifton wrote: > Hi Matt, > > >> There's also a trivial documentation fix: >> >> [PATCH 1/2] doc: Correct __builtin_arm_tinsr prototype documentation >> >> and a test to exercise the intrinsics: >> >> [PATCH 2/2] arm: add iwMMXt mmx-2.c test > > > These have b

Re: [PATCH ARM iWMMXt 0/5] Improve iWMMXt support

2012-06-27 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:56 AM, nick clifton wrote: > Hi Matt, > > >> There's also a trivial documentation fix: >> >> [PATCH 1/2] doc: Correct __builtin_arm_tinsr prototype documentation >> >> and a test to exercise the intrinsics: >> >> [PATCH 2/2] arm: add iwMMXt mmx-2.c test > > > These have

Re: [PATCH ARM iWMMXt 0/5] Improve iWMMXt support

2012-06-26 Thread nick clifton
Hi Matt, There's also a trivial documentation fix: [PATCH 1/2] doc: Correct __builtin_arm_tinsr prototype documentation and a test to exercise the intrinsics: [PATCH 2/2] arm: add iwMMXt mmx-2.c test These have both been checked in. It turns out that both needed minor updates as some of th

Re: [PATCH ARM iWMMXt 0/5] Improve iWMMXt support

2012-06-13 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:26 AM, nick clifton wrote: > Hi Matt, Hi Xinyu, > > >> This series was written by Marvell and sent by Xinyu Qi >> a number of times in the last year. > > > Sorry for the long delay in reviewing these patches.  Overall they were > fine, with only a few, very minor, formatt

Re: [PATCH ARM iWMMXt 0/5] Improve iWMMXt support

2012-06-13 Thread nick clifton
Hi Matt, Hi Xinyu, This series was written by Marvell and sent by Xinyu Qi a number of times in the last year. Sorry for the long delay in reviewing these patches. Overall they were fine, with only a few, very minor, formatting issues. I have committed the entire series of patches to the m

Re: [PATCH ARM iWMMXt 0/5] Improve iWMMXt support

2012-06-11 Thread nick clifton
Hi Matt, This is just to let you know that I am currently reviewing these patches. I do have a problem however. With the patches applied I am seeing very bad results from the gcc testsuite when run with -mcpu=iwmmxt. (Bad as in the testsuite takes days to run and most tests fail). I am

Re: [PATCH ARM iWMMXt 0/5] Improve iWMMXt support

2012-06-06 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
On 29 May 2012 05:13, Matt Turner wrote: > > This series was written by Marvell and sent by Xinyu Qi > a number of times in the last year. > > We (One Laptop per Child) need these patches for reasonable iWMMXt support > and performance. Without them, logical and shift intrinsics cause ICEs, > see