On 10/09/14 09:16, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 04/09/14 07:08, Bin Cheng wrote:
@@ -1872,7 +1892,9 @@ const struct tune_params arm_cortex_a53_tune =
{true, true}, /* Prefer non short
circuit. */
&arm
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>> On 04/09/14 07:08, Bin Cheng wrote:
>>> @@ -1872,7 +1892,9 @@ const struct tune_params arm_cortex_a53_tune =
>>>{true, true}, /* Prefer non short
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On 04/09/14 07:08, Bin Cheng wrote:
>> @@ -1872,7 +1892,9 @@ const struct tune_params arm_cortex_a53_tune =
>>{true, true}, /* Prefer non short
>> circuit. */
>>&arm_default_vec_cost,
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 3:33 AM, Evandro Menezes wrote:
> Bin,
>
> This is perhaps a plus for Aarch64 as well. Is there any plan to add a
> 64-bit version of this patch or should a bug be open for this?
Hi Evandro,
Yes, AARCH64 may want this too. I think Ramana/Marcus should have the
answer/plan
On 04/09/14 07:08, Bin Cheng wrote:
> @@ -1872,7 +1892,9 @@ const struct tune_params arm_cortex_a53_tune =
>{true, true}, /* Prefer non short
> circuit. */
>&arm_default_vec_cost, /* Vectorizer costs. */
>false,
Bin,
This is perhaps a plus for Aarch64 as well. Is there any plan to add a
64-bit version of this patch or should a bug be open for this?
Thank you,
--
Evandro Menezes Austin, TX
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> This patch is posted/approved before at
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-07/msg01398.html
> Unfortunately, it was reverted because a latent bug revealed causing glibc
> build failure and I didn't have enough time to fix back at that
