On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 01:50:48AM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 12:18:42PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > > +/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_prefixed_addr } */
> >
> > Is this test necessary anymore, does -mcpu=power10 not g
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 12:18:42PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 03:53:42PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > Test that stack protection generates prefixed stack instructions if you are
> > using large stack frame for -mcpu=future.
> >
> > 2020-06-01 Michael
Hi!
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 03:53:42PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> Test that stack protection generates prefixed stack instructions if you are
> using large stack frame for -mcpu=future.
>
> 2020-06-01 Michael Meissner
>
> * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-stack-protect.c: New test.
> +
