OK.
Jason
Jason Merrill writes:
> It's hard to compare macro_maps_allocated_size with
> macro_maps_used_size since you have to do subtraction to discover both
> values from what is printed.
OK, I have changed the statistics components accordingly.
> And do the addition in dump_line_table_statistics rath
On 09/16/2011 04:13 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
It seems odd to add in the locations size here since it's also printed
separately.
I wanted macro_maps_used_size to really reflect the total used size
for macro maps, without having to mentally do the addition of its two
components. But at the same
> On 07/16/2011 10:37 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> > +#define ONE_M ONE_K * ONE_K
>
> Parenthesize this so that users don't need to.
OK.
>
> > + macro_maps_used_size =
> > +LINEMAPS_MACRO_USED (set) * sizeof (struct line_map)
> > ++ macro_maps_locations_size;
>
> It seems odd to add in
On 07/16/2011 10:37 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
+#define ONE_M ONE_K * ONE_K
Parenthesize this so that users don't need to.
+ macro_maps_used_size =
+LINEMAPS_MACRO_USED (set) * sizeof (struct line_map)
++ macro_maps_locations_size;
It seems odd to add in the locations size here sinc
