> On 01/23/2018 11:02 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >> On 01/19/2018 12:57 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> >>> Yes, there's a huge difference in between CPU 2006 and 2017. Former has
> >>> 63% w/ dominant edges,
> >>> and later one only 11%. It's caused by these 2 benchmarks with a high
> >>> coverage:
> >>
On 01/23/2018 11:02 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> On 01/19/2018 12:57 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>> Yes, there's a huge difference in between CPU 2006 and 2017. Former has 63%
>>> w/ dominant edges,
>>> and later one only 11%. It's caused by these 2 benchmarks with a high
>>> coverage:
>>>
>>
>> Hi.
>>
> On 01/19/2018 12:57 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> > Yes, there's a huge difference in between CPU 2006 and 2017. Former has 63%
> > w/ dominant edges,
> > and later one only 11%. It's caused by these 2 benchmarks with a high
> > coverage:
> >
>
> Hi.
>
> I'm sending details about the 2 edges tha
On 01/19/2018 12:57 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> Yes, there's a huge difference in between CPU 2006 and 2017. Former has 63%
> w/ dominant edges,
> and later one only 11%. It's caused by these 2 benchmarks with a high
> coverage:
>
Hi.
I'm sending details about the 2 edges that influence the stat
On 01/11/2018 11:39 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> These predictors are in my opinion not reliable and thus I decided to remove
>> them:
>>
>> 1) PRED_NEGATIVE_RETURN: probability is ~51%
>> 2) PRED_RECURSIVE_CALL: there are 2 dominant edges that influence value to
>> 63%;
>> w/o these edges it goes d
> These predictors are in my opinion not reliable and thus I decided to remove
> them:
>
> 1) PRED_NEGATIVE_RETURN: probability is ~51%
> 2) PRED_RECURSIVE_CALL: there are 2 dominant edges that influence value to
> 63%;
> w/o these edges it goes down to 52%
> 3) PRED_POLYMORPHIC_CALL: having ver
