Re: [PATCH 3/5] introduce the binding oracle

2014-06-19 Thread Tom Tromey
Jeff> Just a nit. C-style comment would be appreciated. It might also help Jeff> to clarify what "much more sane" really means here. Jeff> Otherwise, it looks OK to me. Here's the updated patch. Tom 2014-06-19 Phil Muldoon Tom Tromey * c-tree.h (enum c_oracle_request

Re: [PATCH 3/5] introduce the binding oracle

2014-06-05 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Jeff" == Jeff Law writes: Jeff> Just a nit. C-style comment would be appreciated. It might also help Jeff> to clarify what "much more sane" really means here. I made this change locally. The new comment reads: /* Temporarily hide any binding oracle. Without this, calls to debug

Re: [PATCH 3/5] introduce the binding oracle

2014-05-16 Thread Jeff Law
On 05/16/14 09:26, Tom Tromey wrote: gdb wants to supply any declarations that may be referred to by the user's code. Hooking into symbol lookup was an efficient way to accomplish this. This patch introducing a "binding oracle" that is consulted whenever a symbol binding is looked up for the fi