On Sat, 10 Dec 2011, Richard Henderson wrote:
> +/* Begin by defaulting to whatever options were given to the compiler. */
> +int GTM_hwcap HIDDEN = 0
> +#ifdef __VFP_FP__
> + | HWCAP_ARM_VFP
> +#endif
> +#ifdef __IWMMXT__
> + | HWCAP_ARM_IWMMXT
> +#endif
> + ;
It doesn't matter much since th
On 12/14/2011 10:25 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> Otherwise, with the changes for Ramana's comments, this is OK.
For the record, this is the patch as committed.
r~
commit dd120a9705b6c48fdb519e837ad47e41d155f50b
Author: rth
Date: Thu Dec 15 03:24:05 2011 +
arm-linux: Add libitm supp
On 12/14/2011 10:25 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On 10/12/11 23:21, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> diff --git a/libitm/config/arm/hwcap.h b/libitm/config/arm/hwcap.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000..16e4034
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/libitm/config/arm/hwcap.h
>> +
>> +/* The following must ma
On 10/12/11 23:21, Richard Henderson wrote:
> diff --git a/libitm/config/arm/hwcap.h b/libitm/config/arm/hwcap.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..16e4034
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/libitm/config/arm/hwcap.h
> +
> +/* The following must match the kernel's . */
> +#define HWCAP_ARM_SWP
Four small patches relative to the last set.
(1) Big thinko in how to set the EQ condition from the strex results.
And surprisingly that wrong condition PASSES a large portion of the
testsuite, by running through the ll/sc loop twice, with the first
time being truly successful and the
Hi Richard,
Comments inline below..
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 03:21:23PM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> ---
> libitm/Makefile.am |3 +
> libitm/Makefile.in | 20 +++--
> libitm/config/arm/hwcap.cc | 67 +
> libitm/config/arm
