On 06/09/2015 11:31 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
This patch improves the heuristics of the warning in a number of ways.
The improvements are hopefully adequately documented in the code
comments.
The additions to the test case also highlight the improvements.
I tested an earlier version of this patc
On 06/18/2015 10:57 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
[ big snip ]
These bogus warnings are pre-existing, however (i.e. not caused by this
patch).
(nods) Fixing the false positives from libpng/bdwgc sounds like a
separate issue and thus a separate patch then.
Agreed.
jeff
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:31 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 13:31 -0400, Patrick Palka wrote:
>>> This patch improves the heuristics of the warning in a number of ways.
>>> The improvements are hopefully adequately docum
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:31 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 13:31 -0400, Patrick Palka wrote:
>> This patch improves the heuristics of the warning in a number of ways.
>> The improvements are hopefully adequately documented in the code
>> comments.
>>
>> The additions to the tes
On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 13:31 -0400, Patrick Palka wrote:
> This patch improves the heuristics of the warning in a number of ways.
> The improvements are hopefully adequately documented in the code
> comments.
>
> The additions to the test case also highlight the improvements.
>
> I tested an earli
