On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 07:37:13PM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > This wasn't caught in testing, as apparently all testcases that have
> > > target
> > > simd loops with linear/lastprivate clauses also have the corresponding
> > > variables
> > >
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > This wasn't caught in testing, as apparently all testcases that have target
> > simd loops with linear/lastprivate clauses also have the corresponding
> > variables
> > mentioned in target map clause, which makes them addressable (is that
> > necessar
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 06:38:09PM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> I've noticed while re-reading that this patch incorrectly handled SIMT case
> in lower_lastprivate_clauses. The code was changed to look for variables
> with "omp simt private" attribute, and was left under
> 'simduid && DECL_HAS
Hello Jakub,
I've noticed while re-reading that this patch incorrectly handled SIMT case
in lower_lastprivate_clauses. The code was changed to look for variables
with "omp simt private" attribute, and was left under
'simduid && DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P (new_var)' condition. This effectively
constra
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 06:46:32PM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> This patch adjusts privatization in OpenMP SIMD loops lowered for SIMT
> targets.
> At lowering time, private variables receive "omp simt private" attribute, get
> mentioned in argument list of GOMP_SIMT_ENTER function, and get a
