Thanks for those additional information.
I still think that the same way we rely on STL algos for
push_heap/pop_heap/... we should do it for copy/move/... from
stl_algobase.h for RAI.
In fact range algos that are already trying to call C functions should
just try to call the STL counterparts
On 13/02/20 19:07 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
On 2/4/20 3:07 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
This patch implements the C++20 ranges overloads for the algorithms in
[algorithms]. Most of the algorithms were reimplemented, with each of their
implementations very closely following the existing implemen
On 2/4/20 3:07 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
This patch implements the C++20 ranges overloads for the algorithms in
[algorithms]. Most of the algorithms were reimplemented, with each of their
implementations very closely following the existing implementation in
bits/stl_algo.h and bits/stl_algobase.h
On 03/02/20 21:07 -0500, Patrick Palka wrote:
+ template
+struct binary_transform_result
+{
+ [[no_unique_address]] _Iter1 in1;
+ [[no_unique_address]] _Iter2 in2;
+ [[no_unique_address]] _Out out;
+
+ template
+ requires convertible_to &&
+ && converti
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 03/02/20 21:07 -0500, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > +#ifndef _RANGES_ALGO_H
> > +#define _RANGES_ALGO_H 1
> > +
> > +#if __cplusplus > 201703L
> > +
> > +#include
> > +#include
> > +#include
> > +// #include
>
> This line could be removed, or leave i
On 03/02/20 21:07 -0500, Patrick Palka wrote:
+#ifndef _RANGES_ALGO_H
+#define _RANGES_ALGO_H 1
+
+#if __cplusplus > 201703L
+
+#include
+#include
+#include
+// #include
This line could be removed, or leave it as a reminder to me to
refactor so that the small utility pieces are in a small
On 05/02/20 19:39 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
Is it me or the patch isn't an attachment ? It is far more
convenient to provide something easy to extract and apply locally.
On 2/4/20 3:07 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
This patch implements the C++20 ranges overloads for the algorithms in
On 05/02/20 14:24 -0500, Patrick Palka wrote:
Also IIRC, the way __miter_base() is currently defined assumes that the
underlying iterator is copyable which is not necessarily true anymore
for non-forward iterators. So I would have to also fix __miter_base()
which might be risky to do at this sta
[resending with attachment now compressed]
On Wed, 5 Feb 2020, François Dumont wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is it me or the patch isn't an attachment ? It is far more convenient to
> provide something easy to extract and apply locally.
Good point, I've attached the patch as an attachment and I'll make s
Hi
Is it me or the patch isn't an attachment ? It is far more
convenient to provide something easy to extract and apply locally.
On 2/4/20 3:07 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
This patch implements the C++20 ranges overloads for the algorithms in
[algorithms]. Most of the algorithms were reimpl
10 matches
Mail list logo
