On Tue, 5 Nov 2024, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 10/17/24 1:10 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Oct 2024, Patrick Palka wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 15 Oct 2024, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 15 Oct 2024, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > According to [temp.param]/11, the cons
On 10/17/24 1:10 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Tue, 15 Oct 2024, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Tue, 15 Oct 2024, Patrick Palka wrote:
According to [temp.param]/11, the constraint on an auto NTTP is an
associated constraint and so should be checked as part o
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2024, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 15 Oct 2024, Patrick Palka wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 15 Oct 2024, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > >
> > > > According to [temp.param]/11, the constraint on an auto NTTP is an
> > > > associated constrain
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2024, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 15 Oct 2024, Patrick Palka wrote:
> >
> > > According to [temp.param]/11, the constraint on an auto NTTP is an
> > > associated constraint and so should be checked as part of satisfaction
> > > of
On Tue, 15 Oct 2024, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2024, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> > According to [temp.param]/11, the constraint on an auto NTTP is an
> > associated constraint and so should be checked as part of satisfaction
> > of the overall associated constraints rather than checked i
On Tue, 15 Oct 2024, Patrick Palka wrote:
> According to [temp.param]/11, the constraint on an auto NTTP is an
> associated constraint and so should be checked as part of satisfaction
> of the overall associated constraints rather than checked individually
> during coerion/deduction.
By the way,
