Re: [PATCH 2/2] Minor refactoring of tree-vect-patterns.c

2012-05-07 Thread Ulrich Weigand
Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > It looks like you checked in a version of this patch to gcc-4_7-branch. > However, the version you committed used "false" where it should have > used "NULL", causing a bootstrap failure in stage 2 when not using building > in release mode: > > ../../gccgo-gcc/gcc/tree-ve

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Minor refactoring of tree-vect-patterns.c

2012-05-04 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Richard Guenther wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > as a second step in refactoring this patch introduces a routine >> > vect_find_single_use to determine whether a defining statement >> >

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Minor refactoring of tree-vect-patterns.c

2012-05-04 Thread Ulrich Weigand
Richard Guenther wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > > Hello, > > > > as a second step in refactoring this patch introduces a routine > > vect_find_single_use to determine whether a defining statement > > has one single use within the current vectorization domain. > >

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Minor refactoring of tree-vect-patterns.c

2012-05-02 Thread Richard Guenther
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Hello, > > as a second step in refactoring this patch introduces a routine > vect_find_single_use to determine whether a defining statement > has one single use within the current vectorization domain. > > The helper is then called wherever