On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Matthew Wahab
wrote:
> On 18/05/16 11:58, Matthew Wahab wrote:
>> On 18/05/16 02:06, Joseph Myers wrote:
>>> On Tue, 17 May 2016, Matthew Wahab wrote:
>>>
In some tests, there are unavoidable differences in precision when
calculating the actual and the exp
On 18/05/16 11:58, Matthew Wahab wrote:
> On 18/05/16 02:06, Joseph Myers wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 May 2016, Matthew Wahab wrote:
>>
>>> In some tests, there are unavoidable differences in precision when
>>> calculating the actual and the expected results of an FP16 operation. A
>>> new support functi
On 18/05/16 02:06, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Tue, 17 May 2016, Matthew Wahab wrote:
In some tests, there are unavoidable differences in precision when calculating
the actual and the expected results of an FP16 operation. A new support function
CHECK_FP_BIAS is used so that these tests can check fo
On Tue, 17 May 2016, Matthew Wahab wrote:
> In some tests, there are unavoidable differences in precision when
> calculating the actual and the expected results of an FP16 operation. A
> new support function CHECK_FP_BIAS is used so that these tests can check
> for an acceptable margin of error. I
