> On 06/13/14 04:24, mliska wrote:
> >
> >You may ask, why the GNU GCC does need such a new optimization. The
> >compiler, having simply better knowledge of a compiled source file,
> >is capable of reaching better results, especially if Link-Time
> >optimization is enabled. Apart from that, GCC imp
Hi,
On 18/06/14 10:46, Martin Liška wrote:
As one would expect, there is a function 'size'.
Cool, thanks!
Paolo.
On 06/17/2014 10:09 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 13/06/14 12:24, mliska wrote:
The optimization is inspired by Microsoft /OPT:ICF optimization
(http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bxwfs976.aspx) that merges COMDAT
sections with each function reside in a separate section.
In terms
On 06/17/2014 10:14 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 12:24 +0200, mliska wrote:
[...snip...]
Statistics about the pass:
Inkscape: 11.95 MB -> 11.44 MB (-4.27%)
Firefox: 70.12 MB -> 70.12 MB (-3.07%)
FWIW, you wrote 70.12 MB here for both before and after for Firefox, but
On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 12:24 +0200, mliska wrote:
[...snip...]
> Statistics about the pass:
> Inkscape: 11.95 MB -> 11.44 MB (-4.27%)
> Firefox: 70.12 MB -> 70.12 MB (-3.07%)
FWIW, you wrote 70.12 MB here for both before and after for Firefox, but
give a -3.07% change, which seems like a typo
Hi,
On 13/06/14 12:24, mliska wrote:
The optimization is inspired by Microsoft /OPT:ICF optimization
(http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bxwfs976.aspx) that merges COMDAT
sections with each function reside in a separate section.
In terms of C++ testcases, I'm wondering if you already d
On 06/13/14 04:24, mliska wrote:
You may ask, why the GNU GCC does need such a new optimization. The
compiler, having simply better knowledge of a compiled source file,
is capable of reaching better results, especially if Link-Time
optimization is enabled. Apart from that, GCC implementation add
