On 11/14/19 5:23 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 11/13/19 9:03 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> OK. I'd actually recommend this go ahead and get installed. My tester
>> will bootstrap it overnight.
>
> Alright, let me know how that turns out. What kind of machine do you
> have for that?
So patch#1 had a min
On 11/14/19 5:23 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 11/13/19 9:03 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> OK. I'd actually recommend this go ahead and get installed. My tester
>> will bootstrap it overnight.
>
> Alright, let me know how that turns out. What kind of machine do you
> have for that?
Sorry I should have
On 11/13/19 9:03 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> OK. I'd actually recommend this go ahead and get installed. My tester
> will bootstrap it overnight.
Alright, let me know how that turns out. What kind of machine do you
have for that?
Bernd
On 11/13/19 6:08 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> This tidies up a few spots in the m68k backend in preparation for the
> large patch to follow. This is purely for review purposes: this patch
> has not been tested independently, and will be committed together with
> the following one.
>
> Noteworthy ch
This tidies up a few spots in the m68k backend in preparation for the
large patch to follow. This is purely for review purposes: this patch
has not been tested independently, and will be committed together with
the following one.
Noteworthy changes:
Some patterns and peepholes were unified throu
