Re: [PATCH 1/3] c++: Handle ABI for non-polymorphic dynamic classes

On 8/20/24 7:38 PM, Nathaniel Shead wrote: Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk? OK. -- >8 -- The Itanium ABI has specific rules for when virtual tables for dynamic classes should be emitted. However we didn't consider structures with virtual inheritance but no vi

Re: [PATCH 1/3] c++: Handle ABI for non-polymorphic dynamic classes

Ping for https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-August/660956.html (and the rest of this series). On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 09:38:44AM +1000, Nathaniel Shead wrote: > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk? > > -- >8 -- > > The Itanium ABI has specific rules for wh

Re: [PATCH 1/3] c++: Handle ABI for non-polymorphic dynamic classes

Ping for https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-August/660956.html. On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 09:38:44AM +1000, Nathaniel Shead wrote: > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk? > > -- >8 -- > > The Itanium ABI has specific rules for when virtual tables for dynamic

Re: [PATCH 1/3] c++: Handle ABI for non-polymorphic dynamic classes

Ping. On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 09:38:44AM +1000, Nathaniel Shead wrote: > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk? > > -- >8 -- > > The Itanium ABI has specific rules for when virtual tables for dynamic > classes should be emitted. However we didn't consider structures wi