On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 06/27/2012 10:08 AM, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> > On 06/27/2012 09:07 AM, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
>> May I ask about the purpose of the following piece of change? Doesn't
>>
On 06/27/2012 10:08 AM, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> > On 06/27/2012 09:07 AM, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
>>> >> May I ask about the purpose of the following piece of change? Doesn't
>>> >> it affect non-sse cases either?
>> >
>> > Err, no, it doesn
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 06/27/2012 09:07 AM, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
>> May I ask about the purpose of the following piece of change? Doesn't
>> it affect non-sse cases either?
>
> Err, no, it doesn't affect non-sse cases. All MODE_VECTOR_INT
> cases will be im
On 06/27/2012 09:07 AM, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
> May I ask about the purpose of the following piece of change? Doesn't
> it affect non-sse cases either?
Err, no, it doesn't affect non-sse cases. All MODE_VECTOR_INT
cases will be implemented in the xmm registers (ignoring the
deprecated and largely
May I ask about the purpose of the following piece of change? Doesn't
it affect non-sse cases either?
@@ -32038,7 +32042,15 @@ ix86_rtx_costs (rtx x, int code, int
outer_code_i, int opno, int *total,
case ASHIFTRT:
case LSHIFTRT:
case ROTATERT:
- if (!TARGET_64BIT && GET_MODE (XEX
