On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 9:05 AM Kugan Vivekanandarajah
wrote:
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> On 6 July 2018 at 20:17, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 11:45 AM Kugan Vivekanandarajah
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Richard,
> >>
> >> > It was rewrite_to_non_trapping_overfl
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the review.
On 6 July 2018 at 20:17, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 11:45 AM Kugan Vivekanandarajah
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> > It was rewrite_to_non_trapping_overflow available in tree.h. Thus
>> > final value replacement
>> > could use that befo
On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 11:45 AM Kugan Vivekanandarajah
wrote:
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> > It was rewrite_to_non_trapping_overflow available in tree.h. Thus
> > final value replacement
> > could use that before gimplifying instead of using
> > rewrite_to_defined_overflow
> Thanks.
>
> Is the attached
Hi Richard,
> It was rewrite_to_non_trapping_overflow available in tree.h. Thus
> final value replacement
> could use that before gimplifying instead of using rewrite_to_defined_overflow
Thanks.
Is the attached patch OK? I am testing this on x86_64-linux-gnu and if
there is no new regressions.
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 1:29 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 1:02 PM Kugan Vivekanandarajah
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > Thanks for the review.
> >
> > On 28 June 2018 at 21:26, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 7:00 AM Kugan Vivekanandarajah
> > > w
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 1:02 PM Kugan Vivekanandarajah
wrote:
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> On 28 June 2018 at 21:26, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 7:00 AM Kugan Vivekanandarajah
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Richard,
> >>
> >> Thanks for the review.
> >>
> >> On 25
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the review.
On 28 June 2018 at 21:26, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 7:00 AM Kugan Vivekanandarajah
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> Thanks for the review.
>>
>> On 25 June 2018 at 20:01, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 11:13 AM Kugan
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 7:00 AM Kugan Vivekanandarajah
wrote:
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> On 25 June 2018 at 20:01, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 11:13 AM Kugan Vivekanandarajah
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> [PATCH 1/3][POPCOUNT] Handle COND_EXPR in expression_expen
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the review.
On 25 June 2018 at 20:01, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 11:13 AM Kugan Vivekanandarajah
> wrote:
>>
>> [PATCH 1/3][POPCOUNT] Handle COND_EXPR in expression_expensive_p
>
> This says that COND_EXPR itself isn't expensive. I think we should
>
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 11:13 AM Kugan Vivekanandarajah
wrote:
>
> [PATCH 1/3][POPCOUNT] Handle COND_EXPR in expression_expensive_p
This says that COND_EXPR itself isn't expensive. I think we should
constrain that a bit.
I think a good default would be to only allow a single COND_EXPR which
you
10 matches
Mail list logo