On Wed, 14 May 2025, Tamar Christina wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > - /* Loops vectorized with a variable factor won't benefit from
> > > > > + /* Loops vectorized would have already taken into account unrolling
> > specified
> > > > > + by the user as the suggested unroll factor, as such we nee
> > > >
> > > > - /* Loops vectorized with a variable factor won't benefit from
> > > > + /* Loops vectorized would have already taken into account unrolling
> specified
> > > > + by the user as the suggested unroll factor, as such we need to
> > > > prevent the
> > > > + RTL unroller fr
On Tue, 13 May 2025, Tamar Christina wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Richard Biener
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2025 1:59 PM
> > To: Tamar Christina
> > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2]middle-end: Apply loop
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Biener
> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2025 1:59 PM
> To: Tamar Christina
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2]middle-end: Apply loop->unroll directly in vectorizer
>
> On Tue, 13 May 2025, Tamar Chr
On Tue, 13 May 2025, Tamar Christina wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Consider the loop
>
> void f1 (int *restrict a, int n)
> {
> #pragma GCC unroll 4 requested
> for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
> a[i] *= 2;
> }
>
> Which today is vectorized and then unrolled 3x by the RTL unroller due to the
> use of t
