Re: [PATCH 1/2] libphobos: fix CET for non-glibc targets

Excerpts from ibuc...@gdcproject.org's message of December 20, 2021 4:00 pm: >> On 20/12/2021 16:41 Alex Xu (Hello71) wrote: >> >> >> Excerpts from ibuc...@gdcproject.org's message of December 20, 2021 8:56 am: >> >> On 20/12/2021 01:08 Alex Xu (Hello71) via Gcc-patches >> >> wrote: >> >> >>

Re: [PATCH 1/2] libphobos: fix CET for non-glibc targets

> On 20/12/2021 16:41 Alex Xu (Hello71) wrote: > > > Excerpts from ibuc...@gdcproject.org's message of December 20, 2021 8:56 am: > >> On 20/12/2021 01:08 Alex Xu (Hello71) via Gcc-patches > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> On musl, linking against libphobos fails because it requires ucontext > >>

Re: [PATCH 1/2] libphobos: fix CET for non-glibc targets

Excerpts from ibuc...@gdcproject.org's message of December 20, 2021 8:56 am: >> On 20/12/2021 01:08 Alex Xu (Hello71) via Gcc-patches >> wrote: >> >> >> On musl, linking against libphobos fails because it requires ucontext >> but is not explicitly linked against it. This is caused by configure

Re: [PATCH 1/2] libphobos: fix CET for non-glibc targets

> On 20/12/2021 01:08 Alex Xu (Hello71) via Gcc-patches > wrote: > > > On musl, linking against libphobos fails because it requires ucontext > but is not explicitly linked against it. This is caused by configure > assuming that it is implemented in assembly, but it is actually not > implemente