On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 8:22 AM Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> On Sat, 17 Jun 2023, Ken Matsui via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I conducted a benchmark for remove_pointer as well as is_object. Just
> > like the is_object benchmark, here is the benchmark code:
> >
> > https://github.com/ken-matsu
On Sat, 17 Jun 2023, Ken Matsui via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I conducted a benchmark for remove_pointer as well as is_object. Just
> like the is_object benchmark, here is the benchmark code:
>
> https://github.com/ken-matsui/gcc-benches/blob/main/remove_pointer_benchmark.cc
>
> On my comput
Just a quick update, the benchmark code link has been updated and can
now be accessed at
https://github.com/ken-matsui/gcc-benches/blob/main/remove_pointer.cc.
I have also created a report file which can be found at
https://github.com/ken-matsui/gcc-benches/blob/main/remove_pointer.md.
On Sat, Jun
Hi,
I conducted a benchmark for remove_pointer as well as is_object. Just
like the is_object benchmark, here is the benchmark code:
https://github.com/ken-matsui/gcc-benches/blob/main/remove_pointer_benchmark.cc
On my computer, using the gcc HEAD of this patch for a release build,
the patch with
