On Fri, 30 Jul 2021, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
>
> On 7/29/21 9:23 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Jul 2021, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> >
> >> On 7/28/21 2:51 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> >>>
> Ignored functions decls that are compiled at
On 7/29/21 9:23 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
>> On 7/28/21 2:51 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>>
Ignored functions decls that are compiled at the start of
the assembly have bogus line numbers until
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 7/28/21 2:51 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Jul 2021, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> >
> >> Ignored functions decls that are compiled at the start of
> >> the assembly have bogus line numbers until the first .file
> >> directive, as reported in P
On 7/28/21 2:51 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
>> Ignored functions decls that are compiled at the start of
>> the assembly have bogus line numbers until the first .file
>> directive, as reported in PR101575.
>>
>> The work around for this issue is to emit
On Mon, 26 Jul 2021, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Ignored functions decls that are compiled at the start of
> the assembly have bogus line numbers until the first .file
> directive, as reported in PR101575.
>
> The work around for this issue is to emit a dummy .file
> directive when the first function