On 10/31/2017 05:47 AM, Tsimbalist, Igor V wrote:
> The revised patch is attached. The differences are in what options are
> defined and propagated to Makefile for CET enabling. -iclude option is
> dropped, each needed asm file is processed separately.
>
> Igor
>
>
[ ... ]
>
>
> From d41da
t: Friday, October 13, 2017 6:45 PM
> To: Tsimbalist, Igor V
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Jeff Law
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/22] Enable building libbacktrace with Intel CET
>
> "Tsimbalist, Igor V" writes:
>
> >
> > This file is included to simplify
"Tsimbalist, Igor V" writes:
>
> This file is included to simplify building a library that might have
> assembler files.
> This is an auxiliary file to automate creation of a special section in
> an output object
> file. Without it every assembler file has to be modified by hand to
> include a sp
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Lance Taylor [mailto:i...@airs.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 1:59 AM
> To: Tsimbalist, Igor V
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Jeff Law
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/22] Enable building libbacktrace with Intel CET
>
> &quo
On 10/12/2017 05:58 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> "Tsimbalist, Igor V" writes:
>
>> Enable building libbacktrace with CET options.
>>
>> libbacktrace/
>> * configure.ac: Add CET_FLAGS to EXTRA_FLAGS.
>> * aclocal.m4: Regenerate.
>> * Makefile.in: Likewise.
>> * configure: Like
"Tsimbalist, Igor V" writes:
> Enable building libbacktrace with CET options.
>
> libbacktrace/
> * configure.ac: Add CET_FLAGS to EXTRA_FLAGS.
> * aclocal.m4: Regenerate.
> * Makefile.in: Likewise.
> * configure: Likewise.
> +if test x$enable_cet = xyes; then
> + CET_FL
