Re: [PATCH 05/41] Add -fdiagnostics-nn-line-numbers

2020-01-10 Thread Jeff Law
On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 23:35 -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 21:17 -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 04:02 -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > > > I may be able to self-approve this. It's used by the > > > diagnostic_path > > > patch, and by the analyzer test suite. Pe

Re: [PATCH 05/41] Add -fdiagnostics-nn-line-numbers

2020-01-08 Thread Jeff Law
On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 23:35 -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 21:17 -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 04:02 -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > > > I may be able to self-approve this. It's used by the > > > diagnostic_path > > > patch, and by the analyzer test suite. Pe

Re: [PATCH 05/41] Add -fdiagnostics-nn-line-numbers

2020-01-08 Thread David Malcolm
On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 21:17 -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 04:02 -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > > I may be able to self-approve this. It's used by the > > diagnostic_path > > patch, and by the analyzer test suite. Perhaps better to make > > undocumeted, or do it via a DejaGnu pruni

Re: [PATCH 05/41] Add -fdiagnostics-nn-line-numbers

2020-01-08 Thread Jeff Law
On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 04:02 -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > I may be able to self-approve this. It's used by the diagnostic_path > patch, and by the analyzer test suite. Perhaps better to make > undocumeted, or do it via a DejaGnu pruning directive, but I wanted > to get v5 of the kit posted. > >