On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 08:37:19PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 11/09/2015 08:29 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> >as I said in 0/12 this did go through config-list.mk, and checking again
> >this does build on alpha-dec-vms.
>
> The question I have is - why does it build on any other target? It's
On 11/09/2015 08:29 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
as I said in 0/12 this did go through config-list.mk, and checking again
this does build on alpha-dec-vms.
The question I have is - why does it build on any other target? It's the
reference that's unconditional, not the definition. Do we have enou
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 11:44:30AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/09/2015 11:34 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> >In general I think the _DEBUGGING_INFO patches are going to be OK,
> >modulo Jeff's comment about stage 1. I think they shouldn't have been
> >split - it causes numerous unnecessary extra cha
On 11/09/2015 11:34 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
In general I think the _DEBUGGING_INFO patches are going to be OK,
modulo Jeff's comment about stage 1. I think they shouldn't have been
split - it causes numerous unnecessary extra changes, and the
intermediate stages look very inconsistent.
-#ifdef
In general I think the _DEBUGGING_INFO patches are going to be OK,
modulo Jeff's comment about stage 1. I think they shouldn't have been
split - it causes numerous unnecessary extra changes, and the
intermediate stages look very inconsistent.
-#ifdef VMS_DEBUGGING_INFO
- else if (write_symbo
