Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/13] arm: Add GENERAL_AND_VPR_REGS regclass
On 07/09/2021 15:35, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 07/09/2021 13:05, Christophe LYON wrote:
On 07/09/2021 11:42, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 07/09/2021 10:15, Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches wrote:
At some point during the development
On 28/09/2021 13:18, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
Hi Christophe,
-Original Message-
From: Gcc-patches On Behalf Of Christophe
LYON via Gcc-patches
Sent: 08 September 2021 08:49
To: Richard Earnshaw ; gcc-
patc...@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/13] arm: Add GENERAL_AND_VPR_REGS regclass
Hi Christophe,
> -Original Message-
> From: Gcc-patches bounces+kyrylo.tkachov=arm@gcc.gnu.org> On Behalf Of Christophe
> LYON via Gcc-patches
> Sent: 08 September 2021 08:49
> To: Richard Earnshaw ; gcc-
> patc...@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re
On 07/09/2021 15:35, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 07/09/2021 13:05, Christophe LYON wrote:
On 07/09/2021 11:42, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 07/09/2021 10:15, Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches wrote:
At some point during the development of this patch series, it appeared
that in some cases the
On 07/09/2021 13:05, Christophe LYON wrote:
On 07/09/2021 11:42, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 07/09/2021 10:15, Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches wrote:
At some point during the development of this patch series, it appeared
that in some cases the register allocator wants “VPR or general”
rath
On 07/09/2021 11:42, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 07/09/2021 10:15, Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches wrote:
At some point during the development of this patch series, it appeared
that in some cases the register allocator wants “VPR or general”
rather than “VPR or general or FP” (which is the sa
On 07/09/2021 10:15, Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches wrote:
At some point during the development of this patch series, it appeared
that in some cases the register allocator wants “VPR or general”
rather than “VPR or general or FP” (which is the same thing as
ALL_REGS). The series does not see
