Patch proposed at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/635000.html
--
Maxim Kuvyrkov
https://www.linaro.org
> On Sep 27, 2023, at 18:47, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>
> Hi Bernhard,
>
> Thanks, I meant to fix this, but forgot.
>
> The underlying problem here is that we want to de
On 27 September 2023 16:47:27 CEST, Maxim Kuvyrkov
wrote:
>Hi Bernhard,
>
>Thanks, I meant to fix this, but forgot.
np.
>The underlying problem here is that we want to detect which sub-testsuites had
>failures. Current regex doesn't match go's case because there is no "..." at
>the end: "Run
Hi Bernhard,
Thanks, I meant to fix this, but forgot.
The underlying problem here is that we want to detect which sub-testsuites had
failures. Current regex doesn't match go's case because there is no "..." at
the end: "Running foo" vs "Running foo ..." .
My preferred way of fixing this is to
Hi Maxim!
On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 18:06:25 +0400
Maxim Kuvyrkov via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > On Jun 3, 2023, at 19:17, Jeff Law wrote:
> >
> > On 6/2/23 09:20, Maxim Kuvyrkov via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >> This patch adds tracking of current testsuite "tool" and "exp"
> >> to the processing of .sum fi
> On Jun 3, 2023, at 19:17, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 6/2/23 09:20, Maxim Kuvyrkov via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> This patch adds tracking of current testsuite "tool" and "exp"
>> to the processing of .sum files. This avoids aliasing between
>> tests from different testsuites with same name+description.
On 6/2/23 09:20, Maxim Kuvyrkov via Gcc-patches wrote:
This patch adds tracking of current testsuite "tool" and "exp"
to the processing of .sum files. This avoids aliasing between
tests from different testsuites with same name+description.
E.g., this is necessary for testsuite/c-c++-common,
