On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 2:11 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 07/31/2017 05:11 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 04:58:15PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07/31/2017 03:34 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 02:56:40PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
>>
On 07/31/2017 05:11 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 04:58:15PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 07/31/2017 03:34 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 02:56:40PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 07/27/2017 02:30 AM, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote:
From: Trevor Saund
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 04:58:15PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 07/31/2017 03:34 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 02:56:40PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > > On 07/27/2017 02:30 AM, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote:
> > > > From: Trevor Saunders
> > > >
> > > > The preC++
On 07/31/2017 03:34 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 02:56:40PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 07/27/2017 02:30 AM, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders
The preC++ way of passing information about the call site of a function was to
use a macro that passed __
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 02:56:40PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 07/27/2017 02:30 AM, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote:
> > From: Trevor Saunders
> >
> > The preC++ way of passing information about the call site of a function was
> > to
> > use a macro that passed __file__, __LINE__, and __FUNC
On 07/27/2017 02:30 AM, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders
The preC++ way of passing information about the call site of a function was to
use a macro that passed __file__, __LINE__, and __FUNCTION__ to a function with
the same name with _stat appended to it. The way this is
On 07/27/2017 02:43 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:30 AM, wrote:
>> From: Trevor Saunders
>>
>> The preC++ way of passing information about the call site of a function was
>> to
>> use a macro that passed __file__, __LINE__, and __FUNCTION__ to a function
>> with
>> the
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:43:09AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:30 AM, wrote:
> > From: Trevor Saunders
> >
> > The preC++ way of passing information about the call site of a function was
> > to
> > use a macro that passed __file__, __LINE__, and __FUNCTION__ to a f
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 06:31:05PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On 27 July 2017 10:43:09 CEST, Richard Biener
> wrote:
> >On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:30 AM, wrote:
> >> From: Trevor Saunders
> >>
> >> The preC++ way of passing information about the call site of a
> >function was to
On 27 July 2017 10:43:09 CEST, Richard Biener
wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:30 AM, wrote:
>> From: Trevor Saunders
>>
>> The preC++ way of passing information about the call site of a
>function was to
>> use a macro that passed __file__, __LINE__, and __FUNCTION__ to a
>function with
>> t
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:30 AM, wrote:
> From: Trevor Saunders
>
> The preC++ way of passing information about the call site of a function was to
> use a macro that passed __file__, __LINE__, and __FUNCTION__ to a function
> with
> the same name with _stat appended to it. The way this is now
11 matches
Mail list logo