Re: [PATCH 0/2] RISC-V: Define not broken prefetch builtins

On 10/22/23 21:55, Tsukasa OI wrote: What I still don't understand is why we're dealing with a decomposed address in the builtin, define_expand and/or define_insn. Sorry, I misunderstood your intent (quite badly) possibly because I was not familiar with the concept of "predicates" in GCC.

Re: [PATCH 0/2] RISC-V: Define not broken prefetch builtins

On 2023/09/27 6:38, Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 9/22/23 01:11, Tsukasa OI wrote: >> Hello, >> >> As I explained earlier: >> , >> the builtin function for RISC-V "__builtin_riscv_zicbop_cbo_prefetchi" is >> completely broken.  Instead

Re: [PATCH 0/2] RISC-V: Define not broken prefetch builtins

On 9/22/23 01:11, Tsukasa OI wrote: Hello, As I explained earlier: , the builtin function for RISC-V "__builtin_riscv_zicbop_cbo_prefetchi" is completely broken. Instead, this patch set (in PATCH 1/2) creates three new, worki