On 21/07/11 14:14, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
Here is the patch I plan to commit, when patch 1 is approved, and my
testing is complete.
Committed, unchanged.
Andrew
On 18/07/11 15:46, Richard Guenther wrote:
Will signedness be always the same? Usually the canonical check to
use would be !useless_type_conversion_p (type, TREE_TYPE (add_rhs)).
The signedness ought to be unimportant - any extend will be based on the
source type, and the signedness should no
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> As far as I can tell, the patch series so far works great as long as the
> input type of the accumulate value is the same as the output type.
> Unfortunately you get an ICE otherwise doh!
>
> This patch should fix the problem.
>
> I coul
