On 10/22/20 3:19 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 05:45:31PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> I've updated the patch accordingly.
>>
>> FWIW, I now run into an ICE which looks like PR96680:
>
> With the patch I've posted today to fix up declare variant LTO handling,
> Tobias reporte
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 05:45:31PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
> I've updated the patch accordingly.
>
> FWIW, I now run into an ICE which looks like PR96680:
With the patch I've posted today to fix up declare variant LTO handling,
Tobias reported the patch still doesn't work, and there are two
re
On 10/6/20 5:02 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 04:48:40PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> On 10/5/20 3:15 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>>> On 2/7/20 4:29 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:56:38AM +0100, Harwath, Frederik wrote:
> * {target-32.c, thread-limit-
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 04:48:40PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 10/5/20 3:15 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > On 2/7/20 4:29 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:56:38AM +0100, Harwath, Frederik wrote:
> >>> * {target-32.c, thread-limit-2.c}:
> >>> no "usleep" implemented for nvpt
On 10/5/20 3:15 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 2/7/20 4:29 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:56:38AM +0100, Harwath, Frederik wrote:
>>> * {target-32.c, thread-limit-2.c}:
>>> no "usleep" implemented for nvptx. Cf. https://gcc.gnu.org/PR81690
>>
>> Please don't, I want to deal wi
On 2/7/20 4:29 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:56:38AM +0100, Harwath, Frederik wrote:
>> * {target-32.c, thread-limit-2.c}:
>> no "usleep" implemented for nvptx. Cf. https://gcc.gnu.org/PR81690
>
> Please don't, I want to deal with that using declare variant, just didn't
> g
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 08:49:47AM +0100, Harwath, Frederik wrote:
> Add xfails for nvptx offloading because
> "no GOMP_OFFLOAD_async_run implemented in plugin-nvptx.c"
> (https://gcc.gnu.org/PR81688) and because
> "omp target link not implemented for nvptx"
> (https://gcc.gnu.org/PR81689).
>
> li
Hi Jakub,
On 07.02.20 16:29, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:56:38AM +0100, Harwath, Frederik wrote:
>> * {target-32.c, thread-limit-2.c}:
>> no "usleep" implemented for nvptx. Cf. https://gcc.gnu.org/PR81690
>
> Please don't, I want to deal with that using declare variant, just
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:56:38AM +0100, Harwath, Frederik wrote:
> * {target-32.c, thread-limit-2.c}:
> no "usleep" implemented for nvptx. Cf. https://gcc.gnu.org/PR81690
Please don't, I want to deal with that using declare variant, just didn't
get yet around to finishing the last patch needed f
