sday, May 29, 2024 3:14 PM
> To: Feng Xue OS
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] vect: Unify bbs in loop_vec_info and bb_vec_info
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 6:11 PM Feng Xue OS
> wrote:
> >
> > Because bbs of loop_vec_info need to be allo
Ok. Then I will add a TODO comment on "bbs" field to describe it.
Thanks,
Feng
From: Richard Biener
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2024 3:14 PM
To: Feng Xue OS
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vect: Unify bbs in loop_vec_info and b
. */
> + unsigned int nbbs;
> +
> private:
>stmt_vec_info new_stmt_vec_info (gimple *stmt);
>void set_vinfo_for_stmt (gimple *, stmt_vec_info, bool = true);
> @@ -679,9 +685,6 @@ public:
>/* The loop to which this info struct refers to. */
>class loop *loop;
*bb_vec_info;
-#define BB_VINFO_BB(B) (B)->bb
+#define BB_VINFO_BBS(B) (B)->bbs
+#define BB_VINFO_NBBS(B) (B)->nbbs
#define BB_VINFO_GROUPED_STORES(B) (B)->grouped_stores
#define BB_VINFO_SLP_INSTANCES(B)(B)->slp_instances
#defin
On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 4:54 PM Feng Xue OS wrote:
>
> Both derived classes ( loop_vec_info/bb_vec_info) have their own "bbs"
> field, which have exactly same purpose of recording all basic blocks
> inside the corresponding vect region, while the fields are composed by
> different data type, one i
