> > Now afunc writes to __var_5_mma only indirectly so I think it is correct
> > that
> > we optimize the conditional out.
> >
> > Easy fix would be to add -fno-ipa-modref, but perhaps someone with
> > better understanding of Fortran would help me to improve the testcase so
> > the calls to matmul
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 10:45 AM Jan Hubicka via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > > I think the patch causes the following on x86_64-linux-gnu:
> > > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/inline_matmul_17.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times
> > > > optimized "matmul_r4" 2
> > >
> > > I get that failure even with d70
> > >
> > > I think the patch causes the following on x86_64-linux-gnu:
> > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/inline_matmul_17.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times
> > > optimized "matmul_r4" 2
> >
> > I get that failure even with d70ef65692f (from before the patches
> > I committed today).
>
> Sorry, you are rig
On 11/10/21 18:18, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Martin Liška writes:
On 11/8/21 11:43, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches wrote:
|Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu and x86_64-linux-gnu. OK to install?|
I think the patch causes the following on x86_64-linux-gnu:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/inline_matmul_17.f90
Martin Liška writes:
> On 11/8/21 11:43, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> |Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu and x86_64-linux-gnu. OK to install?|
>
> I think the patch causes the following on x86_64-linux-gnu:
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/inline_matmul_17.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times optimized
>
On 11/8/21 11:43, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches wrote:
|Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu and x86_64-linux-gnu. OK to install?|
I think the patch causes the following on x86_64-linux-gnu:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/inline_matmul_17.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times optimized
"matmul_r4" 2
Martin
On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 11:44 AM Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> The vector costs now use a common base class instead of being
> completely abstract. This means that there's no longer a
> need to record the inside and outside costs separately.
>
> Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu and x86_6
