On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> It must've been whitespace then. Your new patch applied just fine.
> I'll be committing shortly.
Committed at r204301.
Diego.
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
>> The patch is OK, but it did not completely apply in my tree. Mind
>> sending an updated version (or point me at a git repo I can pull it
>> from).
>
> interesting, I just pulled and rebased it onto r204296 without any manual
> merging. Pat
> The patch is OK, but it did not completely apply in my tree. Mind
> sending an updated version (or point me at a git repo I can pull it
> from).
interesting, I just pulled and rebased it onto r204296 without any manual
merging. Patch against r204296 attached (obviously haven't tested it
against
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 7:48 PM, wrote:
> From: Trevor Saunders
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch is pretty dull, it just replaces a bunch of things of the form
> vec x;
> x.create (N); // N is a constant
> blah blah
> x.release ();
> by
> stack_vec x;
> blah blah
>
> Of course its even nicer than that in
