On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:11 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Nathan Froyd
> wrote:
>> As $SUBJECT suggests. The patch looks much bigger than it actually is
>> due to re-indentation.
>>
>> Tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK to commit?
Did you run -m32 tests on Linux/x
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> As $SUBJECT suggests. The patch looks much bigger than it actually is
> due to re-indentation.
>
> Tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK to commit?
>
> -Nathan
>
> * function.c (instantiate_virtual_regs): Use FOR_EACH_BB and
>
On 03/24/2011 04:47 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> * function.c (instantiate_virtual_regs): Use FOR_EACH_BB and
> FOR_BB_INSNS_SAFE to iterate through insns. Re-indent.
> * passes.c (init_optimization_passes): Move
> pass_instantiate_virtual_regs after pass_into_cfg_layout_mode.
