On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 10:03:47AM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 02:09:54PM +, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> >
> > On 8 Dec 2011, at 20:55, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> >> ... but, I'll bow out at this juncture -
> >
> > OK, I lied :-)
> >
> > The boehm-gc tests pass for m32 and m64 with
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 05:26:47PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Hi Jack,
>
> > The same argument could be made for PIC itself regarding the testsuite.
> > Aren't we still the only target that defaults to PIC objects? I would think
> > that
>
> certainly not: e.g. both Tru64 UNIX and IRIX are
Hi Jack,
> The same argument could be made for PIC itself regarding the testsuite.
> Aren't we still the only target that defaults to PIC objects? I would think
> that
certainly not: e.g. both Tru64 UNIX and IRIX are PIC by default.
Rainer
--
-
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 02:09:54PM +, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
> On 8 Dec 2011, at 20:55, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>> ... but, I'll bow out at this juncture -
>
> OK, I lied :-)
>
> The boehm-gc tests pass for m32 and m64 with "-fpie/-fPIE" on both x86
> Darwin9 (XC3.1.4) and x86_64 Darwin10 (XC3.2.5);
On 8 Dec 2011, at 20:55, Iain Sandoe wrote:
... but, I'll bow out at this juncture -
OK, I lied :-)
The boehm-gc tests pass for m32 and m64 with "-fpie/-fPIE" on both x86
Darwin9 (XC3.1.4) and x86_64 Darwin10 (XC3.2.5);
I'm building with XC3.2.6 to check that too.
So I think you need to d
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 08:55:17PM +, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
> On 8 Dec 2011, at 20:15, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>>
>>> At present, you pass it when "no-pic, no-pie" etc. are - perhaps it
>>> should just be the default and *only* switched on for -pie something
>>> like
>>>
>>> %{!fpie: %{!PIE: %:
On 8 Dec 2011, at 20:15, Jack Howarth wrote:
At present, you pass it when "no-pic, no-pie" etc. are - perhaps it
should just be the default and *only* switched on for -pie something
like
%{!fpie: %{!PIE: %:version-compare(>= 10.7 mmacosx-version-min= -
no_pie) } }
Otherwise, D11 is behavi
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 05:55:37PM +, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
> On 8 Dec 2011, at 17:24, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 05:05:12PM +, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>>>
>>> On 8 Dec 2011, at 16:58, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 03:54:35PM +, Iain Sandoe wrote:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 05:55:37PM +, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
> On 8 Dec 2011, at 17:24, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 05:05:12PM +, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>>>
>>> On 8 Dec 2011, at 16:58, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 03:54:35PM +, Iain Sandoe wrote:
On 8 Dec 2011, at 17:24, Jack Howarth wrote:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 05:05:12PM +, Iain Sandoe wrote:
On 8 Dec 2011, at 16:58, Jack Howarth wrote:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 03:54:35PM +, Iain Sandoe wrote:
On 8 Dec 2011, at 15:38, Jack Howarth wrote:
Currently the boehm-gc testsui
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 05:05:12PM +, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
> On 8 Dec 2011, at 16:58, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 03:54:35PM +, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>>>
>>> On 8 Dec 2011, at 15:38, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>>
Currently the boehm-gc testsuite fails...
FAIL: boe
On 8 Dec 2011, at 16:58, Jack Howarth wrote:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 03:54:35PM +, Iain Sandoe wrote:
On 8 Dec 2011, at 15:38, Jack Howarth wrote:
Currently the boehm-gc testsuite fails...
FAIL: boehm-gc.c/gctest.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: boehm-gc.c/leak_test.c -O2 execution test
FAIL
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 03:54:35PM +, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
> On 8 Dec 2011, at 15:38, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
>> Currently the boehm-gc testsuite fails...
>>
>> FAIL: boehm-gc.c/gctest.c -O2 execution test
>> FAIL: boehm-gc.c/leak_test.c -O2 execution test
>> FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c -
Iain Sandoe writes:
> On 8 Dec 2011, at 15:38, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
>> Currently the boehm-gc testsuite fails...
>>
>> FAIL: boehm-gc.c/gctest.c -O2 execution test
>> FAIL: boehm-gc.c/leak_test.c -O2 execution test
>> FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c -O2 execution test
>> FAIL: boehm-gc.lib/s
On Dec 8, 2011, at 7:38 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Currently the boehm-gc testsuite fails...
>
> FAIL: boehm-gc.c/gctest.c -O2 execution test
> FAIL: boehm-gc.c/leak_test.c -O2 execution test
> FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c -O2 execution test
> FAIL: boehm-gc.lib/staticrootstest.c -O2 execut
On 8 Dec 2011, at 15:38, Jack Howarth wrote:
Currently the boehm-gc testsuite fails...
FAIL: boehm-gc.c/gctest.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: boehm-gc.c/leak_test.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: boehm-gc.lib/staticrootstest.c -O2 execution test
y
16 matches
Mail list logo