On Thu, 17 Feb 2022, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > +/* Returns whether the control parents of BB are preserved. */
> > +
> > +static bool
> > +control_parents_preserved_p (basic_block bb)
> > +{
> > + /* If we marked the control parents from BB they are preserved. */
> > + if (bitmap_bit_p (visited_c
> +/* Returns whether the control parents of BB are preserved. */
> +
> +static bool
> +control_parents_preserved_p (basic_block bb)
> +{
> + /* If we marked the control parents from BB they are preserved. */
> + if (bitmap_bit_p (visited_control_parents, bb->index))
> +return true;
> +
> +
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2022, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> > > @@ -1272,7 +1275,7 @@ maybe_optimize_arith_overflow (gimple_stmt_iterator
> > > *gsi,
> > > contributes nothing to the program, and can be deleted. */
> > >
> > > static bool
> > > -eliminate_unn
On Tue, 15 Feb 2022, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > @@ -1272,7 +1275,7 @@ maybe_optimize_arith_overflow (gimple_stmt_iterator
> > *gsi,
> > contributes nothing to the program, and can be deleted. */
> >
> > static bool
> > -eliminate_unnecessary_stmts (void)
> > +eliminate_unnecessary_stmts (bool
> @@ -1272,7 +1275,7 @@ maybe_optimize_arith_overflow (gimple_stmt_iterator
> *gsi,
> contributes nothing to the program, and can be deleted. */
>
> static bool
> -eliminate_unnecessary_stmts (void)
> +eliminate_unnecessary_stmts (bool aggressive)
> {
>bool something_changed = false;
