Thanks, now I have totally understand! I think it deserves a clearer
prompt, but I do not have a better idea currently. So forget it, thanks!
在 2023年12月11日星期一，Richard Biener 写道：
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 12:39 PM xndcn wrote:
> >
> > Got it, thanks! It is really confusing >,<
> > What about the
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 12:39 PM xndcn wrote:
>
> Got it, thanks! It is really confusing >,<
> What about the first one? For case MEM_REF.
The same - the LHS determines this is a store, if it is the
RHS is invalid as diagnosed (it needs to go through a
temporary).
Richard.
> 在 2023年12月11日星期一，
Got it, thanks! It is really confusing >,<
What about the first one? For case MEM_REF.
在 2023年12月11日星期一，Richard Biener 写道：
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 4:00 PM xndcn wrote:
> >
> > Hi, I am a newbie in GCC, and I do not have access to git repo.
> >
> > I found some misleading error messages in ver
On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 4:00 PM xndcn wrote:
>
> Hi, I am a newbie in GCC, and I do not have access to git repo.
>
> I found some misleading error messages in verify_gimple_assign_single
> function of tree-cfg.cc. It prompt error "invalid RHS for gimple memory
> store: ", but it checks lhs in fa
