Re: [PATCH] testsuite: pr59833.c and pr61441.c should use -fsignaling-nans

2017-02-20 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 07:24:50PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 05:46:30PM +, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > The testcases pr59833.c and pr61441.c check whether signaling NaNs as > > input to some operation result in quiet NaNs. Without -fsignaling-nans > > this is not

Re: [PATCH] testsuite: pr59833.c and pr61441.c should use -fsignaling-nans

2017-02-20 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 05:46:30PM +, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > The testcases pr59833.c and pr61441.c check whether signaling NaNs as > input to some operation result in quiet NaNs. Without -fsignaling-nans > this is not guaranteed to happen. So, this patch add this option to > these testca

Re: [PATCH] testsuite: pr59833.c and pr61441.c should use -fsignaling-nans

2017-02-16 Thread Jeff Law
On 02/16/2017 10:46 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: The testcases pr59833.c and pr61441.c check whether signaling NaNs as input to some operation result in quiet NaNs. Without -fsignaling-nans this is not guaranteed to happen. So, this patch add this option to these testcases. Tested on powerpc6