Sorry, somehow I missed this email. Yes, that appears to have fixed it!
Thank you very much,
Alan
Trevor Saunders wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 03:37:26PM +0100, Alan Lawrence wrote:
Following this, we're seeing ICEs in tests in gcc.dg/pch.exp and g++.dg/pch.exp,
with cross-builds (hosted on
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 4:57 AM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 04:05:25PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 3:56 AM, wrote:
>> > From: Trevor Saunders
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > There are still some issues to make this work really nicely, but this part
>> >
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 04:05:25PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 3:56 AM, wrote:
> > From: Trevor Saunders
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > There are still some issues to make this work really nicely, but this part
> > is
> > probably good enough its worth reviewing.
> >
> > For one
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 3:56 AM, wrote:
> From: Trevor Saunders
>
> Hi,
>
> There are still some issues to make this work really nicely, but this part is
> probably good enough its worth reviewing.
>
> For one thing you can't use ggc hash_map or set in front ends with some types
> or gengtype wil
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 03:37:26PM +0100, Alan Lawrence wrote:
> Following this, we're seeing ICEs in tests in gcc.dg/pch.exp and
> g++.dg/pch.exp,
> with cross-builds (hosted on x86_64) targetting bare metal AArch64 and ARM
> (aarch64-none-elf, aarch64_be-none-elf and arm-none-eabi; I haven't tes
Following this, we're seeing ICEs in tests in gcc.dg/pch.exp and g++.dg/pch.exp,
with cross-builds (hosted on x86_64) targetting bare metal AArch64 and ARM
(aarch64-none-elf, aarch64_be-none-elf and arm-none-eabi; I haven't tested
armeb-none-eabi; builds targeting linux are OK), for *release build
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:36:27AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 3:56 AM, wrote:
> > From: Trevor Saunders
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > There are still some issues to make this work really nicely, but this part
> > is
> > probably good enough its worth reviewing.
> >
> > For one
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 3:56 AM, wrote:
> From: Trevor Saunders
>
> Hi,
>
> There are still some issues to make this work really nicely, but this part is
> probably good enough its worth reviewing.
>
> For one thing you can't use ggc hash_map or set in front ends with some types
> or gengtype wil