On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:11:47AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > So, given that your solution seems to work, the patch is ok.
>
> Thanks! Here is what I will commit after bootstrap+test (the superfluous
> assert removed, and the comment for the code quoted above tweaked a bit).
I added th
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 05:47:25PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 09/21/2015 04:01 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 01:56:28PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> >>>+ basic_block new_bb = create_empty_bb (EXIT_BLOCK_PTR_FOR_FN
> >>>(cfun)->prev_bb);
> >>>+ BB_COPY_PARTITION (
On 09/21/2015 04:01 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 01:56:28PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
+ basic_block new_bb = create_empty_bb (EXIT_BLOCK_PTR_FOR_FN
(cfun)->prev_bb);
+ BB_COPY_PARTITION (new_bb, pro);
[...]
+ *entry_edge = make_single_succ_edge (new_bb, pro, EDGE_
We might not be able to redirect the jump from the block formerly the
predecessor of PRO, to jump over the new block (it was not necessarily a
fallthrough edge, could be EDGE_COMPLEX). In most cases we could do it
of course. I would prefer not to add special case code (that is not as
well tested
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 01:56:28PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> >+ basic_block new_bb = create_empty_bb (EXIT_BLOCK_PTR_FOR_FN
> >(cfun)->prev_bb);
> >+ BB_COPY_PARTITION (new_bb, pro);
> [...]
> >+ *entry_edge = make_single_succ_edge (new_bb, pro, EDGE_FALLTHRU);
> >+ force_nonfallthru (*ent
On 09/18/2015 05:36 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
{
+ while (pro != entry && !can_get_prologue (pro, prologue_clobbered))
+ {
+ gcc_assert (pro != entry);
Lose the assert, it's redundant with the loop condition.
+ basic_block new_bb = create_empty_bb (EXIT_BLOCK_PTR_
