On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 08:15:56PM +, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
> On 18/12/2020 7:31 pm, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 03:10:52PM +, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
> > > 2020-12-17 Kwok Cheung Yeung
> > >
> > > gcc/testsuite/
> > > * g++.dg/gomp/declare-target-3.C: New.
On 18/12/2020 7:31 pm, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 03:10:52PM +, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
2020-12-17 Kwok Cheung Yeung
gcc/testsuite/
* g++.dg/gomp/declare-target-3.C: New.
Note the test fails on the trunk when one doesn't have offloading
configured. I
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 03:10:52PM +, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
> 2020-12-17 Kwok Cheung Yeung
>
> gcc/testsuite/
> * g++.dg/gomp/declare-target-3.C: New.
Note the test fails on the trunk when one doesn't have offloading
configured. IL scan tests are always problematic, differe
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 03:10:52PM +, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
> --- a/gcc/cp/cp-lang.c
> +++ b/gcc/cp/cp-lang.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ static tree cp_eh_personality (void);
> static tree get_template_innermost_arguments_folded (const_tree);
> static tree get_template_argument_pack_elems_folded
On 08/12/2020 4:24 pm, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
The GCC coding style (appart from libstdc++) is type * rather than type*,
occurs several times in the patch.
Fixed.
+{
+ tree node;
+
+ if (DECL_INITIAL (decl))
+return &DECL_INITIAL (decl);
+
+ for (node = dynamic_initializers; node; node =
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 06:07:28PM +, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
> Even without this patch, G++ currently accepts something like
Sorry for the delay.
> int foo() { return 1; }
> int x = foo();
> #pragma omp declare target to(x)
>
> but will not generate the device-side initializer for x, even
Hello
This patch still needs review.
Thanks
Kwok
On 19/11/2020 6:07 pm, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
On 29/10/2020 10:03 am, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
I'm actually not sure how this can work correctly.
Let's say we have
int foo () { return 1; }
int bar () { return 2; }
int baz () { return 3; }
int qu
On 29/10/2020 10:03 am, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
I'm actually not sure how this can work correctly.
Let's say we have
int foo () { return 1; }
int bar () { return 2; }
int baz () { return 3; }
int qux () { return 4; }
int a = foo ();
int b = bar ();
int c = baz ();
int *d = &c;
int e = qux ();
int f
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 02:20:29PM +, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
> OpenMP 5.0 has a new feature for implicitly marking variables and functions
> that are referenced in the initializers of static variables and functions
> that are already marked 'declare target'. Support was added in the commit
>
