On Thu, 9 Jun 2016, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> > (define_expand "restore_stack_block"
> >[(match_operand 0 "register_operand" "")
> > (match_operand 1 "register_operand" "")]
>
> you've not addressed my previous comments about this.
To be clear -- do you mean that "restore_stack_block" shou
On 06/02/16 17:22, Alexander Monakov wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2016, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
It seems like we should reject the combination of -msoft-stack -fopenacc?
Possibly; the doc text makes it explicit that the option is exposed only for
the purpose of testing the compiler, anyway.
It is alw
On Wed, 25 May 2016, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> > > It seems like we should reject the combination of -msoft-stack -fopenacc?
> >
> > Possibly; the doc text makes it explicit that the option is exposed only for
> > the purpose of testing the compiler, anyway.
>
> It is always best to prevent the user
On 05/24/16 17:29, Alexander Monakov wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2016, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
ah, that's much more understandable, thanks. Presumably this doesn't
support worker-single mode (in OpenACC parlance, I don't know what the OpenMP
version of that is?)
I don't see why you have concerns.
On Fri, 20 May 2016, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> ah, that's much more understandable, thanks. Presumably this doesn't
> support worker-single mode (in OpenACC parlance, I don't know what the OpenMP
> version of that is?)
I don't see why you have concerns. In OpenMP, what OpenACC calls
'worker-sing
On 05/20/16 11:09, Alexander Monakov wrote:
This patch implements '-msoft-stack' code generation variant for NVPTX. The
goal is to avoid relying on '.local' memory space for placement of automatic
data, and instead have an explicitely-maintained stack pointer (which can be
set up to point to pr
On 05/20/2016 09:09 AM, Alexander Monakov wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index d281975..f0331e2 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -19341,6 +19341,18 @@ offloading execution.
Apply partitioned execution optimizations. This is the defau
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 04/20/16 12:59, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> > This patch implements per-warp compiler-defined stacks under -msoft-stack
> > option, and implements alloca on top of that. In a few obvious places,
> > changes from -muniform-simt patch are present in the
On 04/20/16 12:59, Alexander Monakov wrote:
This patch implements per-warp compiler-defined stacks under -msoft-stack
option, and implements alloca on top of that. In a few obvious places,
changes from -muniform-simt patch are present in the hunks.
It'd be better to not mix fragments of patc
