On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 01:36:23PM +, Richard Biener wrote:
> > If we have a match between at least one of the comparison operands and
> > op2/op3, I think having equivalency there is perhaps more important than
> > the canonicalization, but it would be nice not to break it even if there
> > is
On Wed, 19 Jul 2023, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 01:25:45PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > PR middle-end/61747
> > * internal-fn.cc (expand_vec_cond_optab_fn): When the
> > value operands are equal to the original comparison operands
> > preserve that equa
On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 01:25:45PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> PR middle-end/61747
> * internal-fn.cc (expand_vec_cond_optab_fn): When the
> value operands are equal to the original comparison operands
> preserve that equality by re-using the comparison expansion.
>
