On 11/21/13, 5:42 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 20 November 2013 23:57, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>> On 11/20/13, 1:46 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> On 20 November 2013 21:44, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 29 October 2013 15:37, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> This patch addresses two issues with
On 20 November 2013 23:57, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> On 11/20/13, 1:46 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On 20 November 2013 21:44, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> On 29 October 2013 15:37, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
This patch addresses two issues with the libstdc++ testsuite:
* duplicate "
On 20 November 2013 23:57, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>
> Is this patch OK? Is so, please commit it because I do not have an svn
> account.
Yes, that looks OK, thanks. I'll commit it tomorrow.
On 11/20/13, 1:46 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 20 November 2013 21:44, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On 29 October 2013 15:37, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>>> This patch addresses two issues with the libstdc++ testsuite:
>>>
>>> * duplicate "-g -O2" CXXFLAGS
>>> * missing "-g -O2" for remote target
On 20 November 2013 21:44, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 29 October 2013 15:37, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>> This patch addresses two issues with the libstdc++ testsuite:
>>
>> * duplicate "-g -O2" CXXFLAGS
>> * missing "-g -O2" for remote targets
>>
>> The duplicate "-g -O2" flags is a result of
On 29 October 2013 15:37, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> This patch addresses two issues with the libstdc++ testsuite:
>
> * duplicate "-g -O2" CXXFLAGS
> * missing "-g -O2" for remote targets
>
> The duplicate "-g -O2" flags is a result of testsuite_flags.in using
> build-time CXXFLAGS and proc li
On Oct 28, 2013, at 3:29 PM, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> This patch addresses two issues with the libstdc++ testsuite:
>
> * duplicate "-g -O2" CXXFLAGS
> * missing "-g -O2" for remote targets
I need to defer this to the libstdc++ people… there is enough of them, and
they do such a nice job…
