Hi!
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 10:53:40PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Apr 28, 2022, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 03:09:54AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >> +"no __intrinsic_type support for [long] double on PPC w/o
> >> VSX");
> > This change isn't in
On Friday, 29 April 2022 03:53:40 CEST Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Thanks, awaiting feedback on the suggestion above to post the consolidated
> patch.
LGTM. I think this improves clarity for the __intrisic_type static assertions
significantly.
And don't bother with my other mail. If
On Apr 28, 2022, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 03:09:54AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> +# ifdef __VSX__
> No space after # (here and everywhere else).
'k, thanks
>> + "no __intrinsic_type support for [long] double on PPC w/o
>> VSX");
> This change isn
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 03:56:18PM +0200, Matthias Kretz wrote:
> On Thursday, 28 April 2022 08:09:54 CEST Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> > libstdc++'s bits/simd.h section for PPC (Altivec) defines various
> > intrinsic vector types that are only available along with VSX: 64-bit
> > lo
On Thursday, 28 April 2022 08:09:54 CEST Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> libstdc++'s bits/simd.h section for PPC (Altivec) defines various
> intrinsic vector types that are only available along with VSX: 64-bit
> long double, double, (un)signed long long, and 64-bit (un)signed long.
Oh,
Hi!
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 03:09:54AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> libstdc++'s bits/simd.h section for PPC (Altivec) defines various
> intrinsic vector types that are only available along with VSX: 64-bit
> long double, double, (un)signed long long, and 64-bit (un)signed long.
>
> experimenta
