On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 at 08:01, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 11:55, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 11:36, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > >
> > >
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 11:55, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 11:36, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > This f
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 11:55, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 11:36, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > >
> > > > This fixes some misleading text in the libstdc++ manual that says the
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 11:36, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > > This fixes some misleading text in the libstdc++ manual that says the
> > > docs for the gcc-11 branch refer to mainline.
> > >
> > > Ric
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 11:36, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> > This fixes some misleading text in the libstdc++ manual that says the
> > docs for the gcc-11 branch refer to mainline.
> >
> > Richi, is this OK for the gcc-11 branch now? It's been wrong for
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> This fixes some misleading text in the libstdc++ manual that says the
> docs for the gcc-11 branch refer to mainline.
>
> Richi, is this OK for the gcc-11 branch now? It's been wrong for 11.1
> and 11.2, but it would still be nice to fix.
Yes, it's O