Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Reduce output of 'make check'

2023-09-08 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 14:32, Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++ wrote: > > Any objections to this change? Pushed to trunk now. > > -- >8 -- > > This removes the 39 lines of shell commands that get echoed when > starting the testsuite. The fact that near the end of that output it > prints `echo "WARN

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Reduce output of 'make check'

2023-09-08 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
On Fri, 8 Sept 2023 at 13:15, Eric Gallager wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 6:32 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > On Fri, 8 Sept 2023 at 03:16, Eric Gallager wrote: > > > > > > Maybe use $(AM_V_at) instead? That would allow it to be controlled by > > > the --enable-silent-rules flag to config

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Reduce output of 'make check'

2023-09-08 Thread Eric Gallager via Gcc-patches
On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 6:32 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Sept 2023 at 03:16, Eric Gallager wrote: > > > > Maybe use $(AM_V_at) instead? That would allow it to be controlled by > > the --enable-silent-rules flag to configure, as well as make V=1 vs. > > make V=0 too. > > I see two probl

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Reduce output of 'make check'

2023-09-08 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
On Fri, 8 Sept 2023 at 03:16, Eric Gallager wrote: > > Maybe use $(AM_V_at) instead? That would allow it to be controlled by > the --enable-silent-rules flag to configure, as well as make V=1 vs. > make V=0 too. I see two problems with that. Firstly, nobody uses that configure option, so the net

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Reduce output of 'make check'

2023-09-07 Thread Eric Gallager via Gcc-patches
Maybe use $(AM_V_at) instead? That would allow it to be controlled by the --enable-silent-rules flag to configure, as well as make V=1 vs. make V=0 too. On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 9:32 AM Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote: > > Any objections to this change? > > -- >8 -- > > This removes the 39 li