Got
On 14/05/2025 18:46, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Wed, 14 May 2025 at 17:31, François Dumont wrote:
On 12/05/2025 23:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 31/03/25 22:20 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
Following this previous patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/2024-August/059418.html I
On Wed, 14 May 2025 at 17:31, François Dumont wrote:
>
> On 12/05/2025 23:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On 31/03/25 22:20 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Following this previous patch
> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/2024-August/059418.html I've
> >> completed it for t
On 12/05/2025 23:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 31/03/25 22:20 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
Following this previous patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/2024-August/059418.html I've
completed it for the _Safe_unordered_container_base type and
implemented the rest of the change to
On 31/03/25 22:20 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
Following this previous patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/2024-August/059418.html I've
completed it for the _Safe_unordered_container_base type and
implemented the rest of the change to store the safe iterator sequence
as a point
Hi
As back to stage 1is it ok to commit this change ?
François
On 31/03/2025 22:20, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
Following this previous patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/2024-August/059418.html I've
completed it for the _Safe_unordered_container_base type and
implemented the res
